Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Infection ; 2022 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2229772

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Bacterial or virus co-infections with SARS-CoV-2 have been reported in many studies; however, the knowledge on Aspergillus co-infection among patients with COVID-19 was limited. This study was conducted to identify and isolate fungal agents and to evaluate the prevalence of pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) as well as antifungal susceptibility patterns of Aspergillus species in patients with COVID-19 admitted to Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Kashan, Iran. METHODS: The study involved 119 patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia referred to the Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Kashan, Iran. A total of 17 Aspergillus spp. that were isolated from COVID-19 patients suspected of CAPA were enrolled in the study. CAPA was defined using ECMM/ISHAM consensus criteria. The PCR amplification of the ß-tubulin gene was used to identify the species. The antifungal activities of fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B against Aspergillus spp. were evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute manual (M38-A3). RESULTS: From the 119 patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, CAPA was confirmed in 17 cases (14.3%). Of these, 12 (70.6%) were males and 5 (29.4%) were females; the mean age at presentation was 73.8 years (range: 45-88 years; median = 77; IQR = 18). Aspergillus fumigatus (9/17; 52.9%), Aspergillus flavus (5/17; 29.4%), Aspergillus oryzae (3/17, 17.6%), were identified as etiologic agents of CAPA, using the molecular techniques. Voriconazole and amphotericin B showed more activity against all isolates. Moreover, the MIC of fluconazole, itraconazole varied with the tested isolates. For 3 clinical isolates of A. fumigatus, 2 isolate of A. flavus and 3 A. oryzae, the MIC of fluconazole and itraconazole were ≥ 16 µg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high incidence (14.3%) of probable aspergillosis in 119 patients with COVID-19, which might indicate the risk for developing IPA in COVID-19 patients. When comparing patients with and without CAPA regarding baseline characteristics, CAPA patients were older (p =0 .024), had received more frequent systemic corticosteroids (p = 0.024), and had a higher mortality rate (p = 0.018). The outcome of CAPA is usually poor, thus emphasis shall be given to screening and/or prophylaxis in COVID-19 patients with any risk of developing CAPA.

2.
Microb Pathog ; 166: 105520, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1778376

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is attributable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been causing a worldwide health issue. Airways colonization by Candida spp. is prevalent among patients on automatic ventilation in intensive care units (ICUs). This research aimed to ascertain the risk factors and roles of Candida spp. respiratory tract colonization, and Candida lung infection during the progression of COVID-19 pneumonia in critically ill patients. In total, Candida spp. were recovered in 69 from 100 immunosuppressed patients with COVID-19. Bronchoscopy was used to collect the Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens. For the identification of Candida spp. PCR sequencing was done using the ITS1 and ITS4 primers. The amplification of the HWP1 gene was conducted to identify the Candida albicans complex. The antifungal activities of fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B and caspofungin against Candida spp. were evaluated using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M60. In 63.77% of the patients, Candida respiratory colonization at D0 and D14 had no impact on the severity of COVID-19. In comparison to C. albicans strains, Candida respiratory disorder with C. glabrata had influenced the severity of COVID-19 for critically ill patients following adjustment for the risk factors of COVID-19 (P < 0.05). Amphotericin B and caspofungin showed superior activity against all Candida spp. All antifungal agents showed 100% sensitivity against the two C. africana strains. Our observation on patients who used automatic ventilation, respiratory colonization by Candida spp. was not seen to influence the infection or death caused by COVID-19. Amphotericin B and caspofungin showed superior activity against all Candida spp. and were recommended for the treatment regime of pulmonary candidiasis associated with COVID-19 infection. Although "Candida pneumonia" is rarely being reported in critically ill patients, Candida airway colonization mainly by Candida albicans is common especially among patients with diabetes, malignancies, and kidney disorders.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Candidiasis , Pneumonia , Amphotericin B , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida/genetics , Candida albicans , Candida glabrata , Candidiasis/microbiology , Caspofungin/therapeutic use , Critical Illness , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Humans , Lung , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pneumonia/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Emerg Radiol ; 27(6): 607-615, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-714317

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The increasing trend of chest CT utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic necessitates novel protocols with reduced dose and maintained diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of 30-mAs chest CT protocol in comparison with a 150-mAs standard-dose routine protocol for imaging of COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: Upon IRB approval, consecutive laboratory-confirmed positive COVID-19 patients aged 50 years or older who were referred for chest CT scan and had same-day normal CXR were invited to participate in this prospective study. First, a standard-dose chest CT scan (150 mAs) was performed. Only if typical COVID-19 pneumonia features were identified, then a low-dose CT (30 mAs) was done immediately. Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose and standard-dose CT in the detection of typical COVID-19 pneumonia features were compared. RESULTS: Twenty patients with a mean age of 64.20 ± 13.8 were enrolled in the study. There was excellent intrareader agreement in detecting typical findings of COVID-19 pneumonia between low-dose and standard-dose (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.98-0.99, P values < 0.001 all readers). The mean effective dose values in standard- and low-dose groups were 6.60 ± 1.47 and 1.80 ± 0.42 mSv, respectively. Also, absolute cancer risk per mean cumulative effective dose values obtained from the standard- and low-dose CT examinations were 2.71 × 10-4 and 0.74 × 10-4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, it was found that proposed low-dose CT chest protocol is reliable in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia in daily practice with significant reduction in radiation dose and estimated cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Radiation Dosage , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL